Soloveichik (2013)

From Copyright EVIDENCE

Advertising Architectural Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing Programming and broadcasting Computer programming Computer consultancy Creative, arts and entertainment Cultural education Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities

Film and motion pictures Sound recording and music publishing Photographic activities PR and communication Software publishing Video game publishing Specialised design Television programmes Translation and interpretation

1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare 2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? 3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) 4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) 5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media)

A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness)

Source Details

Soloveichik (2013)
Title: Music Originals as Capital Assets
Author(s): Soloveichik, R.
Year: 2013
Citation: Soloveichik, R. (2013) Music Originals as Capital Assets. BEA Working Paper 0096, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Link(s): Open Access
Key Related Studies:
Discipline:
Linked by: Soloveichik (2013)
About the Data
Data Description: The study draws upon music sales and revenue data from secondary sources, primarily the Recording Industry Association of America website.
Data Type: Primary and Secondary data
Secondary Data Sources:
Data Collection Methods:
Data Analysis Methods:
Industry(ies):
Country(ies):
Cross Country Study?: No
Comparative Study?: No
Literature review?: No
Government or policy study?: No
Time Period(s) of Collection:
  • 1929-2010
Funder(s):

Abstract

“In 2007, I estimate that musicians and recording studios created original songs, including recorded performances, with an estimated value of $7.8 billion. These songs were sold on CDs in 2008 and will be played on the radio, on television and at live concerts for decades to come. Because of their long working life, the international guidelines for national accounts recommends that countries classify production of music and other entertainment, literary and artistic originals as an investment activity and then depreciate those songs over time. However, BEA did not capitalize this category of intangible assets until the July 2013 benchmark revision. In order to change the national accounts, I collected data on music production from 1900 to 2010. I then calculated how GDP statistics change when songs are classified as capital assets.
To preview, my empirical results are: 1) In 2007, musicians and studios created recorded music worth $4.3 billion and non-recorded music worth $3.5 billion. Together, these musicians and record studios created original music with a nominal value of $7.8 billion producing recorded music, approximately 0.056% of nominal GDP; 2) Nominal music investment has grown much slower than overall GDP. Between 2000 and 2010, music investment fell from 0.083% of GDP to 0.053%. 3) Original music remains valuable for decades after it is first produced. I calculate that the aggregate capital value of all original music was $30 billion in 2007.”

Main Results of the Study

• Revenues for music sales have been ‘plummeting’ since 2000 (estimating a shrink of ‘real production for music’ from $9.1 billion in 2000 to $7.8 billion in 2007), which may be attributed to diversion of sales to illegal downloading. Instead, most music royalties are paid in respect of performance royalties, rather than sales.
• Whilst music sales have been decreasing, live concert revenues increased by 132% between 2000 and 2007. This may again be a response to illegal downloading, and a need for alternative sources of revenue.
• More than 75% of CD sales occur in the first year, declining rapidly past the first initial five years of release. Original songs similarly depreciate in value by 65% over the first year of their life, eventually stabilising at approx. 4% of their initial sales per year.

Policy Implications as Stated By Author

The study does not make any explicit policy recommendations.



Coverage of Study

Coverage of Fundamental Issues
Issue Included within Study
Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare
Green-tick.png
Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?
Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors)
Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption)
Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media)
Coverage of Evidence Based Policies
Issue Included within Study
Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right)
Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction)
Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing)
Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability)
Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts)
Green-tick.png
Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness)

Datasets

{{{Dataset}}}