Grounded Theory

Methods

Methodology (Collection) Quantitative Collection Methods (305) Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (278) Experimental (Laboratory) (20) Experimental (Field) (10) Experimental (Natural) (13) Web analytic (online user trace data) (88) Quantitative data/text mining (150) Longitudinal Study (27) Snowball sampling (13) Qualitative Collection Methods (280) Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (179) Case Study (100) Ethnography (15) Life History (2) Unstructured Interview (15) Semi-Structured Interview (119) Structured Interview (22) Archival Research (17) Focus Groups (19) Historical Methods (9) Card Sorting (0) Document Research (67) Qualitative content/text mining (72) Visual Ethnography (0) Participant Observation (12)

Methodology (Analysis) Quantitative Analysis Methods (307) Cluster analysis (26) Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (307) Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (112) Correlation and Association (167) Multivariate Statistics (91) Regression Analysis (236) Social Network Analysis (6) Social Sequence Analysis (0) Structural Equation Modeling (58) Meta-Analysis (6) Calibration (1) Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (15) Factor Analysis (16) Decision Tree Method (3) Qualitative Analysis Methods (229) Textual Content Analysis (132) Visual / Other Content Analysis (9) Discourse Analysis (34) Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (127) Ethnographic/narrative analysis (19) Triangulation (2) Legal Analysis (116) Grounded Theory (17) Abduction/Retroduction (1)

Grounded Theory is a qualitative method defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki.

The following studies use this method for data analysis (17):

	Citation
Fiesler, Feuston and Bruckman (2015)	Fiesler, C., Feuston, J. L., & Bruckman, A. S. (2015, February). Understanding Copyright Law in Online Creative Communities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 116-129). ACM.
Garcia-Álvarez, López-Sintas and Zerva (2009)	García‐Álvarez, E., López‐Sintas, J., & Zerva, K. (2009). A contextual theory of accessing music: Consumer behavior and ethical arguments. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 12(3), 243-264.
Hill (2013)	Hill, B. M. (2013). Almost Wikipedia: Eight Early Encyclopedia Projects and the Mechanisms of Collective Action.
Iljadica (2016)	Iljadica, M. (2016) Copyright Beyond Law - Regulating Creativity in the Graffiti Subculture, Hart Publishing
Iljadica (2017)	Iljadica, M., 'Painting on Walls: Street Art without Copyright?', in Darling, K. and Perzanowski, A. (eds.), Creativity Without Law: Challenging the Assumptions of Intellectual Property, New York University Press, New York, 2017, pp. 277–332.
Kaye and Gray (2021)	Kaye, D. B. V., & Gray, J. E. (2021). Copyright Gossip: Exploring Copyright Opinions, Theories, and Strategies on YouTube. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211036940
Kheria (2013)	Kheria, S. (2013). Copyright and Digital Art Practice: The ‘Schizophrenic’Position of the Digital Artist. Leonardo Electronic Almanac, 19(4).
Kretschmer, Klimis, and Choi (1999)	Kretschmer, M., Klimis, G. M., & Choi, C. J. (1999). Increasing returns and social contagion in cultural industries. British Journal of Management, 10(s1), 61-72.
Liebowitz (2006a)	Liebowitz, S. J. (2005). Economists examine file-sharing and music sales.Industrial organization and the digital economy, 145-174.
Papies and Clement (2008)	Papies, D., & Clement, M. (2008). Adoption of new movie distribution services on the Internet. Journal of Media Economics, 21(3), 131-157.
Pappalardo and Aufderheide (2020)	Pappalardo, K. and Aufderheide, P. (2020) Romantic Remixers: Hidden Tropes of Romantic Authorship in Creators’ Attitudes about Reuse. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), pp 1-12
Peace, Galletta and Thong (2003)	Peace, A. G., Galletta, D. F., & Thong, J. Y. (2003). Software piracy in the workplace: A model and empirical test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 153-177.
Scotchmer (2011)	Scotchmer, S. (2011). Ideas and Innovations: Which should be subsidized?. Available at SSRN 1755091.
Sinclair and Green (2016)	Sinclair, G and Green, T (2018) Download or stream? Steal or buy? Developing a typology of today's music consumer. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(1), pp 3 - 14
Singh and Kretschmer (2012)	Singh, S., Kretschmer, M. (2012). Strategic behaviour in the international exploitation of TV formats: A case study of the idols format. Chapter 1 in edited volume – Idols: Authenticity, Identity and Performance in a Global Television Format (eds. Koos Zwaan and Joost de Bruin), Farnham: Ashgate.
Wang, Chen, Yang and Farn (2009)	Wang, C. C., Chen, C. T., Yang, S. C., & Farn, C. K. (2009). Pirate or buy? The moderating effect of idolatry. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 81-93.
Yang, Sonmez, Bosworth and Fryxell (2009)	Yang, D., Sonmez, M., Bosworth, D., & Fryxell, G. (2009). Global software piracy: Searching for further explanations. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 269-283.